Request your free digital audit today
Healthcare worker on a laptop

Choosing a care provider rarely begins with a phone call or a visit. It usually starts earlier, with someone searching online at what may be a difficult and uncertain time.

That person could be a family member whose loved one’s needs have suddenly changed. They may feel overwhelmed, unsure what type of care is required and under pressure to make the right decision quickly. In other cases, the search may be carried out by a social worker, healthcare professional or commissioner trying to identify a suitable provider for someone they support.

Recent research reinforces the importance of this early stage. A 2026 study conducted by Sapio Research for Care England and Log my Care found that 55% of families used directories when looking for care and 40% used online search, compared with 38% who relied on word-of-mouth recommendations. Only 3% considered arranging care straightforward, and many began without a clear understanding of the support they needed.

Opinions are therefore often formed before anyone speaks to an admissions team, visits a service or submits an enquiry. A family may want to understand daily life, safety and cost, while a busy commissioner may simply need to establish whether a provider supports a particular need, operates in the right area and can accept a referral.

A good care website must recognise these different journeys. From the first search to the first visit, it should help each audience find relevant information, establish suitability, build confidence and take an appropriate next step.

The first search: can the right people find you?

People rarely begin with the name of a specific provider. More often, they search around a location, type of care or particular need. A family member might search for “dementia care homes near Cardiff”, “residential care with nursing” or “how much does a care home cost?”. A professional may use more specific language relating to a diagnosis, level of support, referral criteria or geographical area.

Care providers therefore need to be visible for the services, needs and locations they support, not only for their organisation’s name. Individual, well-written pages for each location, service and specialist area of care help search engines understand the organisation’s expertise and allow visitors to recognise quickly whether it may be relevant.

Local visibility is particularly important. Each location should have an accurate Google Business Profile, consistent contact details and useful information about the areas it serves. Care directories, regulator websites and local authority resources also form part of the journey, so information about services, ratings and availability should be consistent wherever it appears.

Search behaviour is continuing to change, with some people using AI-powered tools to ask detailed questions and compare options. Clear page structures, specific information and plain English make it easier for both traditional search engines and AI tools to understand when a provider may be suitable.

Visibility alone is not enough. Page titles and search descriptions should communicate the type of care, location and audience supported. This is one reason the role of your website in increasing occupancy at care homes begins well before an enquiry: if the right people cannot find you, or cannot recognise that you may be suitable, you may never reach their shortlist.

The shortlist: can each audience establish suitability?

Once someone reaches your website, their next task is to decide whether a service could be suitable. At this stage, clarity is more useful than broad claims about quality or compassion.

Families may want to understand whether their loved one’s needs can be met and what everyday life is like. They may look for information about care types, accommodation, activities, visiting, availability and the team. Professionals and commissioners are more likely to prioritise eligibility, specialist expertise, geography and the referral process. If they are comparing several providers while managing a busy caseload, making them search through general service pages creates unnecessary friction.

A clearly labelled “Referrals” page should therefore be prominent in the main navigation. It should explain who can be referred, the needs and circumstances supported, the areas covered, the information required and how to make contact. A named team or contact point, a secure referral route and an indication of what happens next will make the page more useful.

For families, fees are an increasingly important part of assessing suitability. We are seeing more providers publish prices, which is a positive move towards transparency, but a weekly fee or starting price rarely tells the whole story. Providers should explain what is included, what may cost extra and why fees can vary. They should also introduce the relevant funding routes, including self-funding, local authority support and NHS funding, and signpost authoritative guidance. The aim is not to provide personalised financial advice, but to help families understand the terminology and questions they may need to ask.

For multi-site organisations, information must work at group and location level. The group website should communicate shared standards and experience, while individual service pages provide the detail needed to judge suitability. A clear finder can help visitors narrow their options by location, care type or support need. This balance is especially important when planning Care Group Websites: people may value the reassurance of a wider organisation, but their decision will usually centre on a particular service and team.

Building confidence: can visitors trust what they see?

Suitability may put a provider onto the shortlist, but people also need confidence that it will offer safe, compassionate and reliable care. Regulatory ratings are part of that picture, but they are not the only way quality is judged. The Care England research found that just 19% of families used inspection reports such as CQC ratings, with many relying more heavily on reputation, personal recommendations and clear information.

Providers should still make their CQC, CIW or other relevant regulatory information prominent, link to the latest inspection information and explain what they are doing to maintain or improve standards. Trust also grows through details that bring a service to life. Real photographs, manager and team profiles, and stories about how people have been supported are more convincing than generic claims or stock imagery.

Testimonials are strongest when they are specific. Feedback explaining how a team managed a transition, communicated with a family or responded when circumstances changed provides reassurance that general praise cannot. For professionals, evidence of specialist expertise, staff training, safeguarding processes and outcomes can make a provider easier to assess and recommend.

The overall digital experience sends signals too. Outdated news, broken links or inconsistent information can raise doubts, while a current, accessible and easy-to-use website demonstrates attention to detail. Trust is not created by one badge or testimonial. It develops through the consistency of everything a visitor sees.

Two people are engaged in conversation. One person is facing the camera, sitting behind a laptop with a "WebBox" sticker. The other is seated across, seen from behind, with a laptop screen visible.
A man sits at a table with a laptop in a conference room, speaking to a woman. A screen behind him displays a "WebBox" logo and text.
A person with red hair and a beard is sitting at a desk, working on a computer in a modern office environment.

From the shortlist to the first visit: is the next step clear?

Once a visitor believes a provider may be suitable, the website must help them move forward. A generic “Contact us” button can place the responsibility back onto someone who is already unsure what to ask or who they need to speak to.

The next step should match the visitor’s goal. A family member may want to book a visit, check availability, request a callback or discuss a care need. A professional may need to make a referral, confirm suitability or share information securely. These actions should be clearly distinguished rather than sending everyone through the same form.

The language should also reflect the sensitivity of the decision. Calls to action such as “Book a visit”, “Speak to our team” or “Ask us a question” are clear without feeling overly commercial. This is part of a gentle conversion approach for Health & Care websites, where the aim is to reduce uncertainty rather than create pressure.

Forms should request only the information needed to begin the conversation, especially on mobile. More sensitive details can be gathered securely once the right person responds. It also helps to explain who will make contact, how quickly and what the initial conversation will cover. If the usual next stage is a visit, assessment or funding discussion, say so.

The first visit may happen in person, but the journey leading to it is increasingly digital. Easy-to-tap phone numbers, simple forms, clear directions and fast pages can turn confidence into a meaningful conversation without making anyone feel rushed or sold to.

The journey does not end with an enquiry

The experience after an enquiry is just as important. If it is delayed, misdirected or handled inconsistently, the confidence built online can quickly be lost. Families may be contacting several providers when care is needed urgently, so a timely, compassionate and informed response matters.

Professional referrals need equal clarity. Commissioners should receive confirmation that a referral has arrived, know who is reviewing it and understand when to expect a response. Any sensitive information should be shared through an appropriate and secure process.

This is where the connection between the website, CRM and admissions process becomes important. Enquiries should flow into a central system, reach the correct person or service and trigger the right follow-up actions. Integrating a CRM with your healthcare website can reduce manual administration and create a more consistent experience.

Providers should also track whether enquiries lead to conversations, assessments, visits and placements. If a service attracts traffic but few enquiries, its content, availability information or calls to action may need attention. If enquiries rarely progress, the issue may lie in suitability, response times or follow-up. The strongest journeys connect marketing, website experience and internal processes so reassurance continues after first contact.

Reviewing the journey from first search to first visit

Internal teams already understand their services and terminology, so information can feel more obvious than it does to a new visitor. A simple audit can reveal where uncertainty or friction is affecting the journey. Ask:

  • Can people find you when searching by location, care type or support need?
  • Is it immediately clear who you support and which services may be suitable?
  • Can families, professionals and commissioners identify the journey intended for them?
  • Is the Referrals page prominent and useful?
  • Are fees, likely additional costs and funding routes explained clearly?
  • Are ratings, reviews, team information and other trust signals visible?
  • Can someone book a visit, check availability or make a referral without unnecessary friction?
  • Are enquiries directed to the right team and tracked through to visits, assessments and placements?

Complete this exercise across service, specialist care and referral pages, rather than reviewing the homepage alone. It can also be revealing to ask someone outside the organisation to complete a realistic task and watch where they hesitate or become confused.

Make a difficult decision easier

Choosing care is rarely simple. Families may be dealing with uncertainty, guilt or a sudden change in circumstances, while professionals may be under pressure to find a suitable provider quickly. A website cannot remove every difficulty, but it can make the journey clearer.

That means being visible when someone searches, helping each audience establish suitability and providing credible evidence of quality. It also means offering an appropriate next step and ensuring the admissions or referral experience delivers on the reassurance provided online.

The strongest care websites do not rely on aggressive sales tactics. They answer important questions, reduce uncertainty and give people the confidence to begin a conversation. From first search to first visit, making each interaction clear, accessible and reassuring can help more of the right people find your services and move forward.

If you would like to understand where your website may be creating uncertainty or losing potential enquiries, you can apply for a complimentary digital audit. We will review your website, identify the most important opportunities and talk you through our recommendations.

Frequently asked questions

How do families choose a care provider?

Families often use care directories, online search, recommendations and regulator websites to compare providers. They usually consider whether a service meets the person’s needs, its location, reputation, ratings, costs and what daily life is like. Clear information and an easy route to ask questions or visit can influence the final decision.

What information should a care provider website include?

A care provider website should explain who each service supports, the care available, locations, availability, fees and funding, accommodation and daily life. It should also show regulatory ratings, reviews, real photographs and team information, with clear routes for families to enquire and professionals or commissioners to make a referral.

Should care providers publish their fees online?

Publishing a weekly fee, price range or starting price can help families assess affordability and helps to build trust. Pricing should include context: what the fee covers, possible additional costs and why it may vary. Providers should also explain relevant self-funding, local authority and NHS funding routes and signpost authoritative guidance.

Read More…

Toggle dark mode
Skip to content